THE TEXT OF PROF. JONES' TALK IS AVAILABLE ON HIS SITE, BUT HAS BEEN OMITTED HERE. HIS FOOTNOTES TO HIS TALK HAVE BEEN INCLUDED BELOW THE VIDEO FOR FURTHER INFORMATIVE ARTICLES.
THE TEXT OF PROF. JONES' TALK IS AVAILABLE ON HIS SITE, BUT HAS BEEN OMITTED HERE. HIS FOOTNOTES TO HIS TALK HAVE BEEN INCLUDED BELOW THE VIDEO FOR FURTHER INFORMATIVE ARTICLES.
Was the Winter Flu vaccine pre-designed to promote a Coronavirus epidemic?
by Br. Alexis Bugnolo
Italians are still trying to understand why Bergamo, of all the cities of Italy, is the epicenter of the Coronavirus epidemic, while other cities have much much lower rates of infection and mortality.
One factor may be that the city was vaccinated en mass not once, but twice, in the 2 months preceding the Coronavirus outbreak in the city.
In the fall, according to records 141,000 doses of vaccine against the winter flu were administered by the local health board. Of those, 129,000 were Italians over 65 years of age. Of those, 129,000, 70% had grave heart problems.
Then, again, in December, from the 24th through to January, there was a mass vaccination program against Hepatitis-C of 21, 331 citizens of Bergamo. And in the surrounding province, another 12,000 citizens.
Receipt of influenza vaccination was not associated with virus interference among our population. Examining virus interference by specific respiratory viruses showed mixed results. Vaccine derived virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus and human metapneumovirus; however, significant protection with vaccination was associated not only with most influenza viruses, but also parainfluenza, RSV, and non-influenza virus coinfections.
The study included a table which broke down the effects observed:
Which shows in the third column, the standard deviation increase for viral infection by that species of virus after being vaccinated with the winter flu. Corona is listed as 1.36, that is, an increase of 36%.
Sanofi Pasteur’s Conflict of Interest
It is reported that the anti-influenza vaccine administered at Bergamo was Vaxigrip Tetra, a product of Sanofi Pasteur, the same pharmaceutical company which is working on a vaccine for coronavirus! Vaxigrip Tetra is referred to in the Ministry of Health’s Publicity for the winter flu vaccine as a quadri-potent vaccine containing 4 strains of H1N1 and H3N2 influenza viruses, though it is not named there by name, it can be inferred from the vaccine description for Vaxigrip Tetra, which received approval in 2016 for use in Europe. It should be pointed out, however, that neither H1N1 nor H3N2 are classified as coronaviruses, even if their microscopic photographs look nearly identical to the coronavirus.
It remains, therefore, of scientific possibility, that Bergamo, the epicenter for the Coronavirus epidemic, in Italy, and currently in the entire world, was prepared for susceptibility, wittingly or unwittingly. As, David Kaftal reported previously, for FromRome.Info, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has their fingerprints on every aspect of the Corona epidemic. And yes, their Foundation on October 29, 2013 announced a collaborative effort with Sanofi Pasteur to develop faster methods for vaccine Research and Development.
Is it a case of preparing susceptibility so as to justify mass vaccination with the new coronavirus vaccine prepared by Sanofi Pasteur? I will let you decide.
Was the Winter Flu vaccine pre-designed to promote a Coronavirus epidemic?
by Br. Alexis Bugnolo
Italians are still trying to understand
why Bergamo, of all the cities of Italy, is the epicenter of the
Coronavirus epidemic, while other cities have much much lower rates of
infection and mortality.
One factor may be that the city was
vaccinated en mass not once, but twice, in the 2 months preceding the
Coronavirus outbreak in the city.
In the fall, according to records 141,000
doses of vaccine against the winter flu were administered by the local
health board. Of those, 129,000 were Italians over 65 years of age. Of
those, 129,000, 70% had grave heart problems.
Then, again, in December, from the 24th
through to January, there was a mass vaccination program against
Hepatitis-C of 21, 331 citizens of Bergamo. And in the surrounding
province, another 12,000 citizens.
Receipt of influenza vaccination
was not associated with virus interference among our population.
Examining virus interference by specific respiratory viruses showed
mixed results. Vaccine derived virus interference was significantly
associated with coronavirus and human metapneumovirus; however,
significant protection with vaccination was associated not only with
most influenza viruses, but also parainfluenza, RSV, and non-influenza
virus coinfections.
The study included a table which broke down the effects observed:
Which shows in the third column, the
standard deviation increase for viral infection by that species of virus
after being vaccinated with the winter flu. Corona is listed as 1.36,
that is, an increase of 36%.
Sanofi Pasteur’s Conflict of Interest
It is reported that the anti-influenza vaccine administered at Bergamo was Vaxigrip Tetra, a product of Sanofi Pasteur, the same pharmaceutical company which is working on a vaccine for coronavirus! Vaxigrip Tetra is referred to in the Ministry of Health’s Publicity
for the winter flu vaccine as a quadri-potent vaccine containing 4
strains of H1N1 and H3N2 influenza viruses, though it is not named there
by name, it can be inferred from the vaccine description for Vaxigrip Tetra,
which received approval in 2016 for use in Europe. It should be pointed
out, however, that neither H1N1 nor H3N2 are classified as
coronaviruses, even if their microscopic photographs look nearly
identical to the coronavirus.
It remains, therefore, of scientific
possibility, that Bergamo, the epicenter for the Coronavirus epidemic,
in Italy, and currently in the entire world, was prepared for
susceptibility, wittingly or unwittingly. As, David Kaftal reported previously, for FromRome.Info,
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has their fingerprints on every
aspect of the Corona epidemic. And yes, their Foundation on October 29, 2013 announced a collaborative effort with Sanofi Pasteur to develop faster methods for vaccine Research and Development.
Is it a case of preparing susceptibility
so as to justify mass vaccination with the new coronavirus vaccine
prepared by Sanofi Pasteur? I will let you decide.
THERE ARE ONLY SUSPICIONS AT THIS STAGE OVER WHETHER COVID-19 WAS BIO-ENGINEERED OR IF IT IS A NATURAL MUTATION. THE MAINSTREAM NARRATIVE TELLS US THAT THE VIRUS IS NOT MAN-MADE. THE PURPOSE OF THIS BLOG IS TO PRESENT ALTERNATE VIEWS TO WHAT WE CONSIDER COULD BE PROPAGANDA THAT MAY BE INTENDED TO HIDE THE FACTS.
Is Covid-19 man made and released from a Wuhan lab? Evidence of genome editing
I’ve been seeing a lot of the same story being told by various media outlets. All pushing the same narrative, “scientists confirm Covid–19 is not a man–made bioweapon”. It’s only fair that I show the other side of the argument. There is a scientist that says covid-19 is man made and was released from Wuhan lab. The story was first published on March 2. 2020.
A Taiwanese scientist has claimed Chinese microbiologists probably created coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Based on the virus unusual structure it is most likely “man made” and there is a theory coronavirus was somehow leaked or released from the Institute of Virology in Wuhan China, said Professor Fang Chi-tai from the National Taiwan University (NTU). Professor Fang said China’s track record with safety standards and laboratory management has been questioned in the past. The Professor claims it was very possible that the Wuhan Chinese scientists created the deadly virus by simply adding four amino acids to an existing bat virus, which therefore makes it much easier to transmit to people. Professor Fang added, “The mutations found in the novel coronavirus are unusual in an academic sense. “It is indeed possible that it is a man-made product. “From an academic point of view, it is indeed possible that the amino acids were added to COVID-19 in the lab by humans.”
I should point out that Wuhan has the Wuhan Institute of Virology. It’s a level 4 laboratory that was used to store, handle and research samples of SARS, Ebola and other deadly infectious viruses. Fang mentioned the possibility of the virus being leaked from there due to gross mismanagement. Fang also said,
Analyses of the Covid-19 virus have shown that it had a 96% genetic similarity with an RaTG13 bat virus also stored at the institute, and that the Covid-19 could be “manufactured” by modifying the RaTG13 virus. French researchers had discovered four more amino acids in the gene sequence of Covid-19 than other known coronaviruses, which could be added artificially to make the viral transmission easier.
The following was also mentioned,
In February Chinese scientist announced the true cause of the spread of coronavirus, who broke cover and said the oubreak started in a science laboratory in Wuhan yards away from a wet market. A scientist told how a sick bat attacked the researchers and bled on them and urinated on another, they were then forced to quarantine themselves for 14 days. Biologists Botao Xiao and Lei Xiao published a pre-print entitled “The possible origins of 2019-nCoV coronavirus.” The report describes how “the killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan. “We noted two laboratories conducting research on bat coronavirus in Wuhan, one of which was only 280 metres from the seafood market. “We briefly examined the histories of the laboratories and proposed that the coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory. To read more click here and click here.
Evidence for RNA editing in the transcriptome of 2019 Novel Coronavirus
For additional evidence of human influence in the Coronavirus, I’ve provided a link to a PDF file titled “Evidence for RNA editing in the transcriptome of 2019 Novel Coronavirus”. It comes from bioRxiv. You won’t hear anything about this in main stream news. I’ve seen 1 article and it was an attempt to debunk the discovery by accusing the scientists of running a “shabby operation”. Still, the critic never said the discovery was inaccurate.
The 2019-nCoV outbreak has become a global health risk. Editing by host deaminases is an innate 15 restriction process to counter viruses, and it is not yet known whether it operates against coronaviruses. Here we analyze RNA sequences from bronchoalveolar lavage fluids derived from two Wuhan patients. We identify nucleotide changes that may be signatures of RNA editing: Adenosine-to-Inosine changes from ADAR deaminases and Cytosine-to-Uracil changes from APOBEC ones. A mutational analysis of genomes from different strains of human-hosted Coronaviridae reveals patterns similar to the RNA editing pattern observed in the 2019-nCoV transcriptomes. Our results suggest that both APOBECs and ADARs are involved in Coronavirus genome editing, a process that may shape the fate of both virus and patient.
The scientist behind this discovery are Salvatore Di Giorgio, Filippo Martignano, Maria Gabriella Torcia, Giorgio Mattiuz, Silvestro G. Conticello. Affiliations: Core Research Laboratory, ISPRO, Firenze, 50139, Italy. Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, 53100, Italy. Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Firenze 50139, Italy Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, 56124, Pisa, Italy. *bioRxiv is a preprint server for Biology. . Articles are not peer-reviewed, edited, or typeset before being posted online. However, all articles undergo a basic screening process for offensive and/or non-scientific content and for material that might pose a health or biosecurity risk and are checked for plagiarism. No endorsement of an article’s methods, assumptions, conclusions, or scientific quality by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory is implied by its appearance in bioRxiv. An article may be posted prior to, or concurrently with, submission to a journal but should not be posted if it has already been accepted for publication by a journal.
To read complete PDF click here. Click on COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv to view 791 Articles (599 medRxiv, 192 bioRxiv) on Covid-19 and Sars Cov-2. Anyone wanting to jump deeper into the rabbit hole can click the link below. It’s a link to one of my personal research archives. The document is titled “Patents filed that mentions “coronavirus” before year 2000. It contains links to at least 200 patents where the coronavirus is mentioned. Also included are patent owner, affiliations and all relevant information. All filed before the year 2000. Too much to post here at FOTM. (It’s just an archive. Any questions or comments related to the archive must be made here at FOTM). For access click here. You will be asked to provide a password. Enter “corona”.
