BOOM: . U.N. SPOKESMAN FOR THE N.W.O. CONTRADICTS W.H.O HEALTH ADVICE ON COVID-19 AND SLAMS VACCINES. So, Facebook, what are you gunna do about this?

....
YOU WILL BE HAPPY ..................... OR ELSE.


The United Nations has a new web site. They do. It's called....... [wait for it]...... NEW WORLD ORDER.  I kid you not. But we weren't the first to discover this, even though the new web site is very recent.

[What follows is preliminary research without excessive detail because I want to get this expose out ASAP so that others can dig into it before any links or videos disappear. Even so, there will be a lot of hyper links in the following to be investigated further by anyone wishing to do so].

HERE IS THE U.N. NEW WORLD ORDER WEB SITE:   unnwo.org 

HERE IS A SCREENSHOT:

 

NOW, talking about links and videos being 'disappeared', the above information which I first saw and screenshot HAS BEEN CHANGED. Below is a shot of the most recent "about" page of the web site .........




NOTICE THAT THE TWO NAMES, Jamie Illien, and Ndaba Mandella, HAVE BEEN OMITTED !!  I will tell you why I think the particular name NDABA MANDELA has been omitted in a moment, but first let me tell you what the initial approach and methodology of this NWO web site is promoting ..........

IT'S "HAPPINESS". It is. Really. The NWO is promoting HAPPINESS Big Time. Later, as one reads through, it gets to the ..........[ you guessed it] ......... AGENDA 21, 30 and 50 and the 169 SUSTAINABILITY GOALS. Having omitted Ndaba Mandela [Nelson Mandela's grandson], the Front Men for HAPPINESS are Jamye Illien and Luis Gallardo. It appears to me in my cursory and preliminary search that these two chaps started "Happiness Movements" separately as International Days but now have melded their efforts and been adopted by the United Nations as the initial thematic of the New World Order promotion. Jamye began his Happy Clappy days as his own idea. Here he is from a while back ......




Our other player is a Public Relations tyro running a company called Brands and Rousers Foundation which aims to improve companies performance through, yes, happiness because happiness is "A Human Right" - oh, and by changing the world vibrations and such crap. Here he is .........




NOW LET'S SEE THEM TOGETHER, TEAMED UP FOR THE NEW WORLD ORDER........
[The link to them on the NWO page can be found here: https://happytalism.com/ ]




COMMUNITY//

International Day of Happiness 2020 Campaign Theme: HAPPINESS FOR ALL TOGETHER

United Nations NWO (UNNWO) Launches COVID 19 Coronavirus Focused Campaign and World Happiness Fest launches the World Happiness Awards recognizing individuals and communities that are working towards an effective resolution of the damaged created by the COVID 19 around the world.





Happytalism
Happytalism
Responding to the unprecedented, sudden threat of COVID 19 to the health, happiness, and wellbeing of all humanity, as well as the worldwide quarantine, and disruption to the global economy across every sector, industry, and the everyday life of billions of people, the United Nations International Day Of Happiness (UNIDOHappiness) is launching the HAPPINESS FOR ALL, TOGETHER March 20, 2020, International Day of Happiness global campaign theme, to promote and advance worldwide solidarity and unity, in winning the global fight against COVID 19 coronavirus.

NAVIGATE & KNOW YOUR MEDIA BIAS


...

The Media Navigator


The Media Navigator classifies 72 influential media outlets based on their political stance and their relationship to power. In many cases, the latter is more significant.
The Media Navigator has been developed based on an in-depth analysis of news coverage, commentary, media ownership and financing. 
Share onTwitter / Facebook

Direct links to media outlets

  1. Liberal & close to power: HuffPost / The Daily Beast / VICE News / CNN / MSNBC / The Guardian / The Washington Post / Politico / VOX
  2. Liberal & intermediateSlate / Mother Jones / Democracy Now! / The Young Turks / AlterNet / Counterpunch / The Intercept / The Nation / The Real News Network
  3. Liberal & distantThe Canary / Jacobin / WSWS / offGuardian / The Grayzone / 21st Century Wire / TruthOut / TruthDig / Mint Press News
  4. Center & closeBBC / CBS News / ABC News / The New York Times / The Financial Times / The Hill / TIME Magazine / The Economist / USA Today
  5. Center & distantGlobal Research / Anti-Empire / Corbett Report / Moon of Alabama / Consortium News / Last American Vagabond / ICH / The Saker / Voltaire Network
  6. Conservative & closeWall Street Journal / Washington Times / Daily Mail / New York Post / National Review / Washington Examiner / FOX News / Commentary / American Conservative
  7. Conservative & intermediateTownhall / Daily Wire / Washington Free Beacon / Newsmax / Drudge Report / Epoch Times / OAN / Breitbart News / Daily Caller
  8. Conservative & distantZero Hedge / Activist Post / Anti War / Strategic Culture / New Eastern Outlook / Lew Rockwell / The New American / Veterans Today / The Unz Review

...

NAVIGATE & KNOW YOUR MEDIA BIAS


...

The Media Navigator


The Media Navigator classifies 72 influential media outlets based on their political stance and their relationship to power. In many cases, the latter is more significant.
The Media Navigator has been developed based on an in-depth analysis of news coverage, commentary, media ownership and financing. 
Share onTwitter / Facebook

Direct links to media outlets

  1. Liberal & close to power: HuffPost / The Daily Beast / VICE News / CNN / MSNBC / The Guardian / The Washington Post / Politico / VOX
  2. Liberal & intermediateSlate / Mother Jones / Democracy Now! / The Young Turks / AlterNet / Counterpunch / The Intercept / The Nation / The Real News Network
  3. Liberal & distantThe Canary / Jacobin / WSWS / offGuardian / The Grayzone / 21st Century Wire / TruthOut / TruthDig / Mint Press News
  4. Center & closeBBC / CBS News / ABC News / The New York Times / The Financial Times / The Hill / TIME Magazine / The Economist / USA Today
  5. Center & distantGlobal Research / Anti-Empire / Corbett Report / Moon of Alabama / Consortium News / Last American Vagabond / ICH / The Saker / Voltaire Network
  6. Conservative & closeWall Street Journal / Washington Times / Daily Mail / New York Post / National Review / Washington Examiner / FOX News / Commentary / American Conservative
  7. Conservative & intermediateTownhall / Daily Wire / Washington Free Beacon / Newsmax / Drudge Report / Epoch Times / OAN / Breitbart News / Daily Caller
  8. Conservative & distantZero Hedge / Activist Post / Anti War / Strategic Culture / New Eastern Outlook / Lew Rockwell / The New American / Veterans Today / The Unz Review

...

COMPLETING THE JIGSAW OF COVID-19 ORIGINS [#8]




We have all played the children's game of "hidey" where an object is hidden and friends have to find it. As friends hunt it down they go from cold to warm to hot to boiling, and a few shades of temperature in between. On the hunt for the origin of the novel corona virus, SARS-CoV-2, I would suggest that we are at the HOT stage, if not the BOILING stage.

We have all done jigsaws too. The first move usually made is to find the pieces with a straight edge which will form the perimeter of four sides. I believe we have those four edges of the origin puzzle of the new virus [which I like to call the "chimera"]. The edges are - China, United States, Canada, France.

Involved are the Wuhan Lab in China, Ft. Detrick Lab in the U.S., Winnipeg Lab in Canada - but why France? The French just happened to build the Wuhan Lab and were intricately involved with the project. Their involvement involved a quid pro quo, as international favors always do, but exactly what the French asked for in return is unknown. Was it in the nature of trade favors? Was it a case of - "here's a virus we want you to play with"? We don't know the answer but it certainly appears that the French Security Service advised against the project. The below article has details of the French involvement. Our previous series of posts on the Origins [7], detail the involvement of the other players.

Today's two articles posted below, along with our previous posts on "Origins" have begun to fill in the jigsaw from the edges. So far suspicions have become suppositions which have become possibilities and, in turn, these are becoming probabilities. Soon, the probabilities will become certainties, but many questions will never be answered because we are dealing with an oligarchy of elites, bureaucrats and governments which incorporate secret security agencies. Each player will have its own interests.

In addition to our analogous games of jigsaw and hidey, let's play some chess...........

WE ARE PAWNS - 7 BILLION OF US - RIPE FOR THE PICKING ON A WORLD-WIDE CHESS BOARD BY THE KINGS, QUEENS, BISHOPS, KNIGHTS AND ROOKS.

Among these major players are....

The altruists who want the best for us.
The technocrats who see an opportunity to use their technology on us.
The megalomaniacs who see an opportunity to play a role as one of the world's re-designers.
The scientists who put possibilities before humanity
The power hungry who see an opportunity for a massive gain of wealth.
The bureaucrats who will be given more power to command more pawns to obey.
The company men and women who can position their corporation to gain a monopoly.
The ideologues who can see their great worldview come to pass.

Pawns never win. But they play a major role, can take down Big Pieces, and occasionally engineer a checkmate. We have to hope that the 'Altruist' leaders have a conscience and play this right. Most of the rest of the players are sociopaths with no empathy or conscience. There is a new Frankenstein to be invented for science, a chance to reduce the "unsustainable" world population, an opportunity to go down in history as a world savior through vaccine proliferation, a chance to get filthy rich, a position of Command over others, a chance to go down in history. Genuine pundits are seeing the machinations at play in this pandemic chess game. It's not just the tin foil mad hatters. There are questions, important questions that need an answer because it now appears that growing evidence shows that this virus is a chimera and not zoonotic or natural ..........

Who gave the order to engineer the virus and who funded it?
Why?
Was it released accidentally or deliberately?
If deliberately released, who released it? Was it the Wuhan Lab or the Western athletes at the International Military Games in Hubei in October, 2019, or another party?
Why?
If accidentally released, by whom and when and where?
If deliberately released, was the release date known and which individuals or organisations knew?

The good Professor Petrovsky from Adelaide has produced the best evidence of chimeric engineering which is what we here have claimed from the beginning. Petrovsky's concern is totally scientific since his motivation is to be ready for any future outbreak. Understandable. Our interest is to get answers to those questions above because we need to know what designs the main players have for us. That is not an unreasonable statement because we have already been manipulated. Our freedoms have been quashed, businesses have gone bankrupt, production has dwindled, the police state has reared its head, governments have over-ridden rights, laws and constitutions, personal lives have been ruined, technology that is highly suspect has been introduced. These disasters for humanity - NOT the chimera - have been accompanied by pure chicanery, lies, bribery and manipulation. Simply revisit the words of officials that deaths from comorbitities will count as Covid deaths, that extra funding is given to attributing deaths to Covid-19, the war against therapeutic treatments, the kerfuffle about masks and ventillators, the maltreatment of the aged, the manipulation of statistics, the empty hospitals, the denial of medical treatment to non-covid cases, and so on. The virus is real, the propaganda is pure AGENDA - but whose?

We know what has been claimed against the likes of Bill Gates, Tony Fauci, Dr. Tedros, W.H.O, the CCP, the many NGO's and organisations milking the system and taxpayer. We have made claims ourselves of malfeasance. We have posted the blogs here.

Many conservatives have made reference to 'hoax', to 'scamdemic', to 'plandemic'. Judging by the stats, even though the stats have been rigged to some extent, it is obvious that government over-reach is a gross understatement and that the putative labels are warranted. The virus is real but the mitigation is a scam for control now..... control by those I listed above minus those 'altruistic' leaders who have made human mistakes, and made those mistakes because they definitely don't want to be responsible for mass deaths, acquire a reviled reputation, nor be voted out at the next election. In retrospect we may forgive them, but WE WANT ANSWERS NOW.

I now invite readers to read the two articles linked below that evidences what has been said above and also, if you haven't read them, our post series on Origins Of The Virus.

OUR SERIES BEGINS HERE: https://www.righttospeakout.com/2020/03/the-origin-of-coronavirus.html
OR CLICK ON OUR LABELS "COVID ORIGINS"

TODAY'S ARTICLE FROM THE DAILY MAIL: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8351091/Top-vaccine-scientist-says-coronavirus-come-animal-freak-nature.html

EXCERPT.........

Coronavirus is 'uniquely adapted to infect humans': Top vaccine scientist says it could only have come from an animal through a 'freak of nature' - and the possibility it leaked from Wuhan lab MUST be investigated

Wuhan virus lab was signed off by EU Brexit chief Michel Barnier in 2004 - despite French intelligence warnings that China's poor bio-security reputation could lead to a catastrophic leak 
By  Glen Owen for the Mail on Sunday  
The construction of the Chinese laboratory at the centre of mounting suspicion over the source of the Covid-19 pandemic was signed off by the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier – despite warnings by French intelligence services.
Mr Barnier – currently embroiled in acrimonious negotiations with the UK over a post-Brexit trade deal – was the French foreign minister when he gave the go-ahead for work to start on the Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2004, under a joint deal with the Chinese.
The move came despite strong opposition from French diplomatic and security advisers, who argued that the Chinese reputation for poor bio-security could lead to a catastrophic leak.
They also warned that Paris could lose control of the project, and even suggested that Beijing could harness the technology to make biowarfare weapons.
Eleven years later, as the laboratory prepared to open, the French architects of the project complained that they had, as feared, been ousted by the Chinese communist government.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SKY NEWS INTERVIEW WITH PROF. PETROVSKY: https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6158843835001