LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, A SPOKESMAN FROM STANFORD UNI. MED. SCHOOL HAS JUST HOURS AGO ANNOUNCED THAT THEY HAVE TRIALED A DRUG WITH 100% EFFECTIVENESS AGAINST CORONA VIRUS. THE DRUG IS A WELL KNOWN TREATMENT FOR MALARIA CALLED CHLOROQUINE.
THIS MAY, AND I SAY MAY, BE THE REASON THAT AFRICANS ARE LESS AFFECTED BY THE PANDEMIC, SINCE IT MAY ALREADY BE IN THEIR SYSTEM. IT MAY ALSO BE THE REASON THAT CHINA APPEARS TO HAVE LIMITED THE DEATH RATE FROM THE VIRUS MORE THAN HAVE SOME WESTERN COUNTRIES AS THEY MAY HAVE ALREADY BEEN EMPLOYING THE DRUG.
I DID SAY: "OH, WAIT" ! REGARDING THIS BREAKING NEWS. I WILL TELL YOU WHY, AFTER THIS SEGMENT FROM TUCKER CARLSON.
OH, WAIT, BECAUSE THE CHINESE ANNOUNCED THIS TREATMENT OVER A MONTH AGO. Two brief clips follow .....
Do you believe that the West did not know about this development in China? Will you be wondering why, in 2 months time, this drug is not being employed everywhere? CLUE: IT IS CHEAP. NOT MUCH PROFIT THERE FOR THE PHARMA STATE. PROBLEM: The drug derives from a tree native to Peru and my research thus far suggests these trees are becoming scarce. Research ongoing. This is a preliminary post.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, A SPOKESMAN FROM STANFORD UNI. MED. SCHOOL HAS JUST HOURS AGO ANNOUNCED THAT THEY HAVE TRIALED A DRUG WITH 100% EFFECTIVENESS AGAINST CORONA VIRUS. THE DRUG IS A WELL KNOWN TREATMENT FOR MALARIA CALLED CHLOROQUINE.
THIS MAY, AND I SAY MAY, BE THE REASON THAT AFRICANS ARE LESS AFFECTED BY THE PANDEMIC, SINCE IT MAY ALREADY BE IN THEIR SYSTEM. IT MAY ALSO BE THE REASON THAT CHINA APPEARS TO HAVE LIMITED THE DEATH RATE FROM THE VIRUS MORE THAN HAVE SOME WESTERN COUNTRIES AS THEY MAY HAVE ALREADY BEEN EMPLOYING THE DRUG.
I DID SAY: "OH, WAIT" ! REGARDING THIS BREAKING NEWS. I WILL TELL YOU WHY, AFTER THIS SEGMENT FROM TUCKER CARLSON.
OH, WAIT, BECAUSE THE CHINESE ANNOUNCED THIS TREATMENT OVER A MONTH AGO. Two brief clips follow .....
Do you believe that the West did not know about this development in China? Will you be wondering why, in 2 months time, this drug is not being employed everywhere? CLUE: IT IS CHEAP. NOT MUCH PROFIT THERE FOR THE PHARMA STATE. PROBLEM: The drug derives from a tree native to Peru and my research thus far suggests these trees are becoming scarce. Research ongoing. This is a preliminary post.
There are many theories on the origin of Covid-19 and how it was spread. China is blaming the Americans and the US and most of the rest of the world are blaming China.
I am not here going into the "how" of it's transmission, but looking at discussion around its origin or invention, if you like. This is important for pundits opining on the matter because the wrong attribution can see opiners wiped off social media, de-monetized, or have previous research burned.
Some posters have been claiming that the virus originated in the US. Such posters and bloggers have been sanctioned in one way or another. A fact check was recently carried out by USA TODAY which ascertained that the virus originated in China and that it was transmitted by animals to humans in the wet markets in Wuhan - possibly by bats and/or pagolin [scaly ant eater]. DON'T DARE POST ANY OTHER THEORY. Not even the suggestion that it was released from the virology labs in Wuhan either deliberately or accidentally. [The most reasonable cause, excluding nefarious intent which may be likely, is that infected lab animals were sold to traders since it is apparently common knowledge that this occurs for big money]. I am well aware of the many other theories that are considered CT's, and personally I think they ought be free to air and to let people decide, but the tech platforms won't allow it. Here is the [rather flimsy] fact checking article, but my punch-line comes at the end.....
Fact check: Coronavirus originated in China, not elsewhere, researchers and studies say
Matthew Brown
The claim: The coronavirus originated outside China
A piece published by the Centre for Research on Globalization and circulated on social media claims the virus known as COVID-19 originated outside China.
That March 11 posting makes references to a March 4 post on the same site by the same author that claims the virus "may have originated in the U.S." Titled “A Shocking Update. Did The Virus Originate in the U.S.?” the earlier post makes several questionable claims about the origins of COVID-19 while misrepresenting cited research and media reports.
The central claim of both the March 4 and 11 posts — that COVID-19 may have been brought to China by the U.S. Army — was recently echoed by a Chinese government official on Twitter. The Chinese official's claims were presented without evidence.
Several of the central statements in the March 4 article misrepresent cited research or make unclear assertions. USA TODAY reached out to Larry Romanoff, author of both posts, for clarification on several of the claims made, but was unable to reach him for comment.
What researchers say: COVID-19 originated in China
The consensus among researchers studying the spread of the virus pinpoints COVID-19’s likely origin to a “wet market,” or live animal market, in Wuhan, China. Though experts have not ruled out the possibility that the pathogen could have been brought to the market by an already infected person, there is no evidence to suggest COVID-19 originated outside the country.
The origin theory for the virus is supplemented by preliminary research into the disease’s genome, as well as the origins of similar diseases. Researchers at the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Centre published the genome of COVID-19 two weeks after cases were reported in late December 2019. Gene sequencing analysis strongly suggests the virus originated in bats and was transferred to humans through a yet-unidentified intermediary species. In early February, Chinese researchers published work suggesting the intermediary species may have been the pangolin (also called a scaly anteater), though this work has not yet undergone a peer-reviewed study.
The conditions for such interspecies pathogen transfer are ripe in wet markets, which are common in parts of Asia, Africa and Latin America. Severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, resulted from a virus transferring from bats to civet cats and then humans. SARS, discovered in 2003, originated at a wet market similar to the one now suspected to be the origin of COVID-19.
Other claims and theories about the origins of COVID-19, including that the virus was brought to by the U.S. Army during the Military World Games in October in Wuhan, are unsubstantiated and not supported by research into the virus.
An article circulating on social media claims COVID-19 did not originate in China. We rate this claim FALSE because it is not supported by research. The consensus among experts researching the virus places the beginning of its spread at the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan, China.
WHAT I DON'T KNOW IS WHETHER THE ABOVE PATENT IS FOR THIS STRAIN OF VIRUS, IF IT IS THE BASE MODEL FOR THE "NOVEL" CORONA VIRUS, OR IF WHAT WAS PATENTED BEARS NO RELATION TO THE PRESENT VIRUS IN QUESTION. BUT, INTERESTING NO LESS.
. *********************** .
EDIT: ADDITIONAL PURPORTED EVIDENCE [19.3.20] From a web site which the Patriot Right claims is an anti-Western agitprop site. [At the end of this article, I will post this claim from The National Pulse]. Readers can make their own judgement.
COVID-19: Further Evidence that the Virus Originated in the US
It would be useful to read this prior article for background: China’s Coronavirus: A Shocking Update. Did The Virus Originate in the US? By Larry Romanoff, March 04, 2020 *** As readers will recall from the earlier article (above), Japanese and Taiwanese epidemiologists and pharmacologists have determined that the new coronavirus could have originated in the US since that country is the only one known to have all five types – from which all others must have descended. Wuhan in China has only one of those types, rendering it in analogy as a kind of “branch” which cannot exist by itself but must have grown from a “tree”. The Taiwanese physician noted that in August of 2019 the US had a flurry of lung pneumonias or similar, which the Americans blamed on ‘vaping’ from e-cigarettes, but which, according to the scientist, the symptoms and conditions could not be explained by e-cigarettes. He said he wrote to the US officials telling them he suspected those deaths were likely due to the coronavirus. He claims his warnings were ignored. Immediately prior to that, the CDC totally shut down the US Military’s main bio-lab at Fort Detrick, Maryland, due to an absence of safeguards against pathogen leakages, issuing a complete “cease and desist” order to the military. It was immediately after this event that the ‘e-cigarette’ epidemic arose.
We also had the Japanese citizens infected in September of 2019, in Hawaii, people who had never been to China, these infections occurring on US soil long before the outbreak in Wuhan but only shortly after the locking down of Fort Detrick. Then, on Chinese social media, another article appeared, aware of the above but presenting further details. It stated in part that five “foreign” athletes or other personnel visiting Wuhan for the World Military Games (October 18-27, 2019) were hospitalised in Wuhan for an undetermined infection. The article explains more clearly that the Wuhan version of the virus could have come only from the US because it is what they call a “branch” which could not have been created first because it would have no ‘seed’. It would have to have been a new variety spun off the original ‘trunk’, and that trunk exists only in the US. (1) There has been much public speculation that the coronavirus had been deliberately transmitted to China but, according to the Chinese article, a less sinister alternative is possible. If some members of the US team at the World Military Games (18-27 October) had become infected by the virus from an accidental outbreak at Fort Detrick it is possible that, with a long initial incubation period, their symptoms might have been minor, and those individuals could easily have ‘toured’ the city of Wuhan during their stay, infecting potentially thousands of local residents in various locations, many of whom would later travel to the seafood market from which the virus would spread like wildfire (as it did). That would account also for the practical impossibility of locating the legendary “patient zero” – which in this case has never been found since there would have been many of them. Next, Daniel Lucey, an infectious disease expert at Georgetown University in Washington, said in an article in Science magazine that the first human infection has been confirmed as occurring in November 2019, (not in Wuhan), suggesting the virus originated elsewhere and then spread to the seafood markets. “One group put the origin of the outbreak as early as 18 September 2019.” (2) (3)
Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spreading globally. Description of earliest cases suggests the outbreak began elsewhere. The article states:
“As confirmed cases of a novel virus surge around the world with worrisome speed, all eyes have so far focused on a seafood market in Wuhan, China, as the origin of the outbreak. But a description of the first clinical cases published in The Lancet on Friday challenges that hypothesis.” (4) (5)
The paper, written by a group of Chinese researchers from several institutions, offers details about the first 41 hospitalized patients who had confirmed infections with what has been dubbed 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). In the earliest case, the patient became ill on 1 December 2019 and had no reported link to the seafood market, the authors report. “No epidemiological link was found between the first patient and later cases”, they state. Their data also show that, in total, 13 of the 41 cases had no link to the marketplace. “That’s a big number, 13, with no link”, says Daniel Lucey . . . (6) Earlier reports from Chinese health authorities and the World Health Organization had said the first patient had onset of symptoms on 8 December 2019 – and those reports simply said “most” cases had links to the seafood market, which was closed on 1 January. (7) “Lucey says if the new data are accurate, the first human infections must have occurred in November 2019 – if not earlier – because there is an incubation time between infection and symptoms surfacing. If so, the virus possibly spread silently between people in Wuhan – and perhaps elsewhere – before the cluster of cases from the city’s now-infamous Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market was discovered in late December. “The virus came into that marketplace before it came out of that marketplace”, Lucey asserts. “China must have realized the epidemic did not originate in that Wuhan Huanan seafood market”, Lucey told Science Insider. (8) Kristian Andersen is an evolutionary biologist at the Scripps Research Institute who has analyzed sequences of 2019-nCoV to try to clarify its origin. He said the scenario was “entirely plausible” of infected persons bringing the virus into the seafood market from somewhere outside. According to the Science article,
“Andersen posted his analysis of 27 available genomes of 2019-nCoV on 25 January on a virology research website. It suggests they had a “most recent common ancestor” – meaning a common source – as early as 1 October 2019.” (9)
It was interesting that Lucey also noted that MERS was originally believed to have come from a patient in Saudi Arabia in June of 2012, but later and more thorough studies traced it back to an earlier hospital outbreak of unexplained pneumonia in Jordan in April of that year. Lucey said that from stored samples from people who died in Jordan, medical authorities confirmed they had been infected with the MERS virus. (10) This would provide impetus for caution among the public in accepting the “official standard narrative” that the Western media are always so eager to provide – as they did with SARS, MERS, and ZIKA, all of which ‘official narratives’ were later proven to have been wrong. In this case, the Western media flooded their pages for months about the COVID-19 virus originating in the Wuhan seafood market, caused by people eating bats and wild animals. All of this has been proven wrong. Not only did the virus not originate at the seafood market, it did not originate in Wuhan at all, and it has now been proven that it did not originate in China but was brought to China from another country. Part of the proof of this assertion is that the genome varieties of the virus in Iran and Italy have been sequenced and declared to have no part of the variety that infected China and must, by definition, have originated elsewhere. It would seem the only possibility for origination would be the US because only that country has the “tree trunk” of all the varieties. And it may therefore be true that the original source of the COVID-19 virus was the US military bio-warfare lab at Fort Detrick. This would not be a surprise, given that the CDC completely shut down Fort Detrick, but also because, as I related in an earlier article, between 2005 and 2012 the US had experienced 1,059 events where pathogens had been either stolen or escaped from American bio-labs during the prior ten years. *
Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He can be contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com. He is a frequent contributor to Global Research.
HERE IS THE OBJECTION TO THE ABOVE "EVIDENCE" FROM THE NATIONAL PULSE..
Chinese bots have flocked to Twitter since the beginning of the coronavirus public relations effort emanating from Beijing.
In the past few days especially, brand new “bot”-like accounts following zero people, and being followed back by no one, have flooded Twitter threads attacking the United States of America, President Trump, and many who believe the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) should have to answer tough questions about the COVID-19 coronavirus.
Just a few of the bots made in recent months promoting Chinese propaganda (Raheem Kassam/The National Pulse)The accounts appear to be flocking to defend Chinese Communist Party state actors such as Lijian Zhao – China’s “Information Department” Deputy Director General, and Lin Songtian, China’s Ambassador to South Africa. Thousands of new accounts – many the same attacking the President and the United States – were created in March 2020 and have taken to “liking” and “retweeting” CCP propagandists such as Zhao and Songtian, including on stories such as: “COVID-19: Further Evidence that the Virus Originated in the US”.
The article links to a conspiracy theory published in an outlet called GlobalResearch.ca, a Canadian-based site which often disseminates anti-Western propaganda. The Chinese bots also promote the website separately. Other recent articles on ‘Global Research’ include:
Western Anti-Chinese Propaganda Exaggerates Coronavirus Danger, Creates Panic;
Coronavirus Is Becoming a Western Excuse for Sinophobia and “China-Bashing”;
America’s “Hybrid War” against China has Entered a New Phase;
COVID-19 Coronavirus: A Fake Pandemic? Who’s Behind It?;
Coronavirus COVID-19: “Made in China” or “Made in America”?
The accounts have not been suspended and/or limited by Twitter, and neither CNN, the New York Times, the Washington Post, nor the rest of the political or media establishments in the Western have commented upon the surge in social media agitprop pushed by the CCP. One can’t help but wonder if this would be the same if Russia were behind the disinformation campaign.
Raheem Kassam is the Editor-in-Chief of the National Pulse, and former senior advisor to Brexit leader Nigel Farage. Kassam is the best-selling author of 'No Go Zones' and 'Enoch Was Right', a co-host at the War Room: Impeachment podcast, a Lincoln fellow at the Claremont Institute, and a fellow at the Bow Group think tank. Kassam is an academic advisory board member at the Institut des Sciences Sociales, Economiques et Politiques in Lyon, France. He resides in Washington, D.C
There are many theories on the origin of Covid-19 and how it was spread. China is blaming the Americans and the US and most of the rest of the world are blaming China.
I am not here going into the "how" of it's transmission, but looking at discussion around its origin or invention, if you like. This is important for pundits opining on the matter because the wrong attribution can see opiners wiped off social media, de-monetized, or have previous research burned.
Some posters have been claiming that the virus originated in the US. Such posters and bloggers have been sanctioned in one way or another. A fact check was recently carried out by USA TODAY which ascertained that the virus originated in China and that it was transmitted by animals to humans in the wet markets in Wuhan - possibly by bats and/or pagolin [scaly ant eater]. DON'T DARE POST ANY OTHER THEORY. Not even the suggestion that it was released from the virology labs in Wuhan either deliberately or accidentally. [The most reasonable cause, excluding nefarious intent which may be likely, is that infected lab animals were sold to traders since it is apparently common knowledge that this occurs for big money]. I am well aware of the many other theories that are considered CT's, and personally I think they ought be free to air and to let people decide, but the tech platforms won't allow it. Here is the [rather flimsy] fact checking article, but my punch-line comes at the end.....
Fact check: Coronavirus originated in China, not elsewhere, researchers and studies say
Matthew Brown
The claim: The coronavirus originated outside China
A piece
published by the Centre for Research on Globalization and circulated on
social media claims the virus known as COVID-19 originated outside
China.
That March 11 posting makes references to a March 4 post
on the same site by the same author that claims the virus "may have
originated in the U.S." Titled “A Shocking Update. Did The Virus
Originate in the U.S.?” the earlier post makes several questionable
claims about the origins of COVID-19 while misrepresenting cited
research and media reports.
The central claim
of both the March 4 and 11 posts — that COVID-19 may have been brought
to China by the U.S. Army — was recently echoed by a Chinese government official on Twitter. The Chinese official's claims were presented without evidence.
Several
of the central statements in the March 4 article misrepresent cited
research or make unclear assertions. USA TODAY reached out to Larry
Romanoff, author of both posts, for clarification on several of the
claims made, but was unable to reach him for comment.
What researchers say: COVID-19 originated in China
The consensus among researchers studying the spread of the virus pinpoints COVID-19’s likely origin to a “wet market,” or
live animal market, in Wuhan, China. Though experts have not ruled out
the possibility that the pathogen could have been brought to the market
by an already infected person, there is no evidence to suggest COVID-19
originated outside the country.
The
origin theory for the virus is supplemented by preliminary research
into the disease’s genome, as well as the origins of similar diseases.
Researchers at the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Centre published the genome of COVID-19
two weeks after cases were reported in late December 2019. Gene
sequencing analysis strongly suggests the virus originated in bats and
was transferred to humans through a yet-unidentified intermediary
species. In early February, Chinese researchers published work
suggesting the intermediary species may have been the pangolin (also
called a scaly anteater), though this work has not yet undergone a
peer-reviewed study.
The
conditions for such interspecies pathogen transfer are ripe in wet
markets, which are common in parts of Asia, Africa and Latin America. Severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS,
resulted from a virus transferring from bats to civet cats and then
humans. SARS, discovered in 2003, originated at a wet market similar to
the one now suspected to be the origin of COVID-19.
Other claims and theories about the origins of COVID-19, including that the virus was brought to by the U.S. Army during the Military World Games in October in Wuhan, are unsubstantiated and not supported by research into the virus.
An article circulating on social media
claims COVID-19 did not originate in China. We rate this claim FALSE
because it is not supported by research. The consensus among experts
researching the virus places the beginning of its spread at the Huanan
Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan, China.
WHAT I DON'T KNOW IS WHETHER THE ABOVE PATENT IS FOR THIS STRAIN OF VIRUS, IF IT IS THE BASE MODEL FOR THE "NOVEL" CORONA VIRUS, OR IF WHAT WAS PATENTED BEARS NO RELATION TO THE PRESENT VIRUS IN QUESTION. BUT, INTERESTING NO LESS.
. *********************** .
EDIT: ADDITIONAL PURPORTED EVIDENCE [19.3.20] From a web site which the Patriot Right claims is an anti-Western agitprop site. [At the end of this article, I will post this claim from The National Pulse]. Readers can make their own judgement.
COVID-19: Further Evidence that the Virus Originated in the US
It would be useful to read this prior article for background: China’s Coronavirus: A Shocking Update. Did The Virus Originate in the US? By Larry Romanoff, March 04, 2020
*** As readers will recall from the earlier article (above), Japanese
and Taiwanese epidemiologists and pharmacologists have determined that
the new coronavirus could have originated in the US since that country
is the only one known to have all five types – from which all others
must have descended. Wuhan in China has only one of those types,
rendering it in analogy as a kind of “branch” which cannot exist by
itself but must have grown from a “tree”.
The Taiwanese physician noted that in August of 2019 the US had a
flurry of lung pneumonias or similar, which the Americans blamed on
‘vaping’ from e-cigarettes, but which, according to the scientist, the
symptoms and conditions could not be explained by e-cigarettes. He
said he wrote to the US officials telling them he suspected those deaths
were likely due to the coronavirus. He claims his warnings were
ignored.
Immediately prior to that, the CDC totally shut down the US
Military’s main bio-lab at Fort Detrick, Maryland, due to an absence of
safeguards against pathogen leakages, issuing a complete “cease and
desist” order to the military. It was immediately after this event that
the ‘e-cigarette’ epidemic arose.
We also had the Japanese citizens infected in September of 2019, in
Hawaii, people who had never been to China, these infections occurring
on US soil long before the outbreak in Wuhan but only shortly after the
locking down of Fort Detrick.
Then, on Chinese social media, another article appeared, aware of the
above but presenting further details. It stated in part that five
“foreign” athletes or other personnel visiting Wuhan for the World
Military Games (October 18-27, 2019) were hospitalised in Wuhan for an
undetermined infection.
The article explains more clearly that the Wuhan version of the virus
could have come only from the US because it is what they call a
“branch” which could not have been created first because it would have
no ‘seed’. It would have to have been a new variety spun off the
original ‘trunk’, and that trunk exists only in the US. (1)
There has been much public speculation that the coronavirus had been
deliberately transmitted to China but, according to the Chinese article,
a less sinister alternative is possible.
If some members of the US team at the World Military Games (18-27
October) had become infected by the virus from an accidental outbreak at
Fort Detrick it is possible that, with a long initial incubation
period, their symptoms might have been minor, and those individuals
could easily have ‘toured’ the city of Wuhan during their stay,
infecting potentially thousands of local residents in various locations,
many of whom would later travel to the seafood market from which the
virus would spread like wildfire (as it did).
That would account also for the practical impossibility of locating
the legendary “patient zero” – which in this case has never been found
since there would have been many of them.
Next, Daniel Lucey, an infectious disease expert at Georgetown University in Washington, said in an article in Science magazine
that the first human infection has been confirmed as occurring in
November 2019, (not in Wuhan), suggesting the virus originated elsewhere
and then spread to the seafood markets. “One group put the origin of
the outbreak as early as 18 September 2019.” (2) (3)
Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spreading globally.
Description of earliest cases suggests the outbreak began elsewhere.
The article states:
“As confirmed cases of a novel virus surge around the
world with worrisome speed, all eyes have so far focused on a seafood
market in Wuhan, China, as the origin of the outbreak. But a description
of the first clinical cases published in The Lancet on Friday
challenges that hypothesis.” (4) (5)
The paper, written by a group of Chinese researchers from several
institutions, offers details about the first 41 hospitalized patients
who had confirmed infections with what has been dubbed 2019 novel
coronavirus (2019-nCoV).
In the earliest case, the patient became ill on 1 December 2019 and
had no reported link to the seafood market, the authors report. “No
epidemiological link was found between the first patient and later
cases”, they state. Their data also show that, in total, 13 of the 41
cases had no link to the marketplace. “That’s a big number, 13, with no
link”, says Daniel Lucey . . . (6)
Earlier reports from Chinese health authorities and the World Health
Organization had said the first patient had onset of symptoms on 8
December 2019 – and those reports simply said “most” cases had links to
the seafood market, which was closed on 1 January. (7)
“Lucey says if the new data are accurate, the first human infections
must have occurred in November 2019 – if not earlier – because there is
an incubation time between infection and symptoms surfacing. If so, the
virus possibly spread silently between people in Wuhan – and perhaps
elsewhere – before the cluster of cases from the city’s now-infamous
Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market was discovered in late December. “The
virus came into that marketplace before it came out of that
marketplace”, Lucey asserts.
“China must have realized the epidemic did not originate in that Wuhan Huanan seafood market”, Lucey told Science Insider. (8) Kristian Andersen is an evolutionary biologist at
the Scripps Research Institute who has analyzed sequences of 2019-nCoV
to try to clarify its origin. He said the scenario was “entirely
plausible” of infected persons bringing the virus into the seafood
market from somewhere outside. According to the Science article,
“Andersen posted his analysis of 27 available genomes of
2019-nCoV on 25 January on a virology research website. It suggests they
had a “most recent common ancestor” – meaning a common source – as
early as 1 October 2019.” (9)
It was interesting that Lucey also noted that MERS was originally
believed to have come from a patient in Saudi Arabia in June of 2012,
but later and more thorough studies traced it back to an earlier
hospital outbreak of unexplained pneumonia in Jordan in April of that
year. Lucey said that from stored samples from people who died in
Jordan, medical authorities confirmed they had been infected with the
MERS virus. (10)
This would provide impetus for caution among the public in accepting
the “official standard narrative” that the Western media are always so
eager to provide – as they did with SARS, MERS, and ZIKA, all of which
‘official narratives’ were later proven to have been wrong.
In this case, the Western media flooded their pages for months about
the COVID-19 virus originating in the Wuhan seafood market, caused by
people eating bats and wild animals. All of this has been proven wrong. Not only did the virus not originate at the seafood market, it did not originate in Wuhan at all,
and it has now been proven that it did not originate in China but was
brought to China from another country. Part of the proof of this
assertion is that the genome varieties of the virus in Iran and Italy
have been sequenced and declared to have no part of the variety that
infected China and must, by definition, have originated elsewhere.
It would seem the only possibility for origination would be the US
because only that country has the “tree trunk” of all the varieties. And
it may therefore be true that the original source of the COVID-19 virus
was the US military bio-warfare lab at Fort Detrick. This would not be a
surprise, given that the CDC completely shut down Fort Detrick, but
also because, as I related in an earlier article, between 2005 and 2012
the US had experienced 1,059 events where pathogens had been either
stolen or escaped from American bio-labs during the prior ten years.
*
Note to readers: please click the share
buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists.
Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Larry Romanoff is a
retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior
executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an
international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor
at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international
affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is
currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and
the West. He can be contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com. He is a frequent contributor to Global Research.
HERE IS THE OBJECTION TO THE ABOVE "EVIDENCE" FROM THE NATIONAL PULSE..
Chinese bots have flocked to Twitter since the beginning of the coronavirus public relations effort emanating from Beijing.
In the past few days especially, brand new “bot”-like accounts
following zero people, and being followed back by no one, have flooded
Twitter threads attacking the United States of America, President Trump,
and many who believe the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) should have to
answer tough questions about the COVID-19 coronavirus.
Just a few of the bots made in recent months promoting Chinese propaganda (Raheem Kassam/The National Pulse)
The accounts appear to be flocking to defend Chinese Communist Party
state actors such as Lijian Zhao – China’s “Information Department”
Deputy Director General, and Lin Songtian, China’s Ambassador to South Africa.
Thousands of new accounts – many the same attacking the President and
the United States – were created in March 2020 and have taken to
“liking” and “retweeting” CCP propagandists such as Zhao and Songtian,
including on stories such as: “COVID-19: Further Evidence that the Virus
Originated in the US”.
The article links to a conspiracy theory
published in an outlet called GlobalResearch.ca, a Canadian-based site
which often disseminates anti-Western propaganda. The Chinese bots also
promote the website separately.
Other recent articles on ‘Global Research’ include:
Western Anti-Chinese Propaganda Exaggerates Coronavirus Danger, Creates Panic;
Coronavirus Is Becoming a Western Excuse for Sinophobia and “China-Bashing”;
America’s “Hybrid War” against China has Entered a New Phase;
COVID-19 Coronavirus: A Fake Pandemic? Who’s Behind It?;
Coronavirus COVID-19: “Made in China” or “Made in America”?
The accounts have not been suspended and/or limited by Twitter, and neither CNN, the New York Times, the Washington Post,
nor the rest of the political or media establishments in the Western
have commented upon the surge in social media agitprop pushed by the
CCP.
One can’t help but wonder if this would be the same if Russia were behind the disinformation campaign.
Raheem Kassam is the Editor-in-Chief of the
National Pulse, and former senior advisor to Brexit leader Nigel Farage.
Kassam is the best-selling author of 'No Go Zones' and 'Enoch Was
Right', a co-host at the War Room: Impeachment podcast, a Lincoln fellow
at the Claremont Institute, and a fellow at the Bow Group think tank.
Kassam is an academic advisory board member at the Institut des Sciences
Sociales, Economiques et Politiques in Lyon, France. He resides in
Washington, D.C
Barrie Drewitt-Barlow is expecting triplets with new partner Scott Hutchinson
A disproportionate number of very strange stories about the Reproductive Revolution originate in the land of fruits and nuts, i.e. California. However, it would be unfair to ignore Florida, a state which does a lot of heavy lifting in this area. Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Dave Barry claims that although Florida has only 6% of the US population, it contributes 73% of the nation’s weirdness. Inevitably, some of these involve bioethics. The latest involves Barrie Drewitt-Barlow, a British expat who is a minor celebrity in the UK media. He and his then-partner Tony were the first same-sex couple in Europe to have both dads on the birth certificates of their children. Now they run an international surrogacy agency and live in a luxurious mansion in Florida. Why Florida? Because commercial surrogacy is illegal in the UK. “We are the poster boys of same-sex parenting,” Barrie told the Tampa Bay Times. At the moment they have four sons and a daughter created with the help of a variety of egg donors and surrogates. Barrie and Tony were married in 2014, after a partnership which began in 1987. Last October, however, they separated and Barrie has repartnered with Scott Hutchinson, a man half his age. Scott was his personal assistant for seven years and used to date his 20-year-old daughter Saffron. “I know people will think Scott is only after my money and all that,” says Barry. “He is, after all, 25 years younger than me — but I don’t care. I’m going to enjoy every moment that I can, while I can." In October Barrie and Scott are expecting triplet daughters via a surrogate mother, selected because of her “gorgeous looks” and high IQ. “Our family has too many boys and too much testosterone! So we used sex selection to even things out,” says Barrie. “We know we are having girls.” Tony is still part of the household and has agreed to be the godfather for the triplets. Barrie explained to The Sun: “Tony is excited too, although it does underline that our marriage really is over after all these years, so it is very bittersweet. But we are all going to remain living under the same roof. Tony is Dad, I'm Daddy and while at the moment Scott is stepdad, soon he's going to be Daddy Two. “We are happy, we want to co-parent our kids and that's all that matters. If people don't get it, that's their problem, not ours.” Barrie is not at all self-conscious about his unconventional family life. He told The Sun: “All of our biological connections are about to get even more complicated with the girls but we just regard ourselves as a very modern family. As far as we are concerned they are brothers and sisters. What does the biology matter as long as they are loved and have a stable home? “There are far more dysfunctional households than ours, we are just unconventional, as our kids have three parents who adore them.” Actually, even more kids are involved. Barrie’s policy is to mix his sperm with his partners’ so that the children cannot be sure who their father is. But he has also donated sperm to a lesbian couple in the UK and both of the women are pregnant and due to give birth in September. “There’s my children and theirs to celebrate,” he says. “After all these years there are going to be babies everywhere.” And actually, there’s another child in the mix – a boy whom Barrie fathered in a drunken night out when he was 19. He only met his son 21 years later. It’s all rather muddled. The children whom Barrie has fathered don’t know who their mother is, or don’t know him as a father, or are not sure whether he is their father. Is that fair to them? Barrie, Tony and Scott appear to think that lavishing money on children is an adequate trade-off for a mother. It’s not. But perhaps this is what happens when you start tinkering with the institution of marriage. Seriously weird people with bags of money turn children into a fashion accessory. Dave Barry has an explanation for bizarre stories like this. “My argument has been for a long time that it's not so much Floridians are weird …, it's people who come to Florida: we are like the Ellis Island for weird, stupid people—they come to Florida to commit stupid acts.” Michael Cook is editor of MercatorNet
Barrie Drewitt-Barlow is expecting triplets with new partner Scott Hutchinson
A disproportionate number of very strange stories about the
Reproductive Revolution originate in the land of fruits and nuts, i.e.
California. However, it would be unfair to ignore Florida, a state which
does a lot of heavy lifting in this area. Pulitzer Prize-winning
columnist Dave Barry claims that although Florida has only 6% of the US population, it contributes 73% of the nation’s weirdness.
Inevitably, some of these involve bioethics.
The latest involves Barrie Drewitt-Barlow,
a British expat who is a minor celebrity in the UK media. He and his
then-partner Tony were the first same-sex couple in Europe to have both
dads on the birth certificates of their children. Now they run an
international surrogacy agency and live in a luxurious mansion in
Florida. Why Florida? Because commercial surrogacy is illegal in the UK.
“We are the poster boys of same-sex parenting,” Barrie told the Tampa Bay Times. At the moment they have four sons and a daughter created with the help of a variety of egg donors and surrogates.
Barrie and Tony were married in 2014, after a partnership which began
in 1987. Last October, however, they separated and Barrie has
repartnered with Scott Hutchinson, a man half his age. Scott was his
personal assistant for seven years and used to date his 20-year-old
daughter Saffron. “I know people will think Scott is only after my money
and all that,” says Barry. “He is, after all, 25 years younger than me —
but I don’t care. I’m going to enjoy every moment that I can, while I
can."
In October Barrie and Scott are expecting triplet daughters via a
surrogate mother, selected because of her “gorgeous looks” and high IQ.
“Our family has too many boys and too much testosterone! So we used sex
selection to even things out,” says Barrie. “We know we are having
girls.”
Tony is still part of the household and has agreed to be the godfather for the triplets.
Barrie explained to The Sun:
“Tony is excited too, although it does underline that our marriage
really is over after all these years, so it is very bittersweet. But we
are all going to remain living under the same roof. Tony is Dad, I'm
Daddy and while at the moment Scott is stepdad, soon he's going to be
Daddy Two.
“We are happy, we want to co-parent our kids and that's all that
matters. If people don't get it, that's their problem, not ours.”
Barrie is not at all self-conscious about his unconventional family life. He told The Sun:
“All of our biological connections are about to get even more
complicated with the girls but we just regard ourselves as a very modern
family. As far as we are concerned they are brothers and sisters. What
does the biology matter as long as they are loved and have a stable
home?
“There are far more dysfunctional households than ours, we are just
unconventional, as our kids have three parents who adore them.”
Actually, even more kids are involved. Barrie’s policy is to mix his
sperm with his partners’ so that the children cannot be sure who their
father is. But he has also donated sperm to a lesbian couple in the UK
and both of the women are pregnant and due to give birth in September.
“There’s my children and theirs to celebrate,” he says. “After all these
years there are going to be babies everywhere.”
And actually, there’s another child in the mix – a boy whom Barrie fathered in a drunken night out when he was 19. He only met his son 21 years later.
It’s all rather muddled. The children whom Barrie has fathered don’t
know who their mother is, or don’t know him as a father, or are not sure
whether he is their father. Is that fair to them? Barrie, Tony and
Scott appear to think that lavishing money on children is an adequate
trade-off for a mother. It’s not.
But perhaps this is what happens when you start tinkering with the
institution of marriage. Seriously weird people with bags of money turn
children into a fashion accessory. Dave Barry
has an explanation for bizarre stories like this. “My argument has been
for a long time that it's not so much Floridians are weird …, it's
people who come to Florida: we are like the Ellis Island for weird,
stupid people—they come to Florida to commit stupid acts.” Michael Cook is editor of MercatorNet
Lefties’ default is always censorship, banning, restrictions, house arrest, etc.. The first sign of a Leftie is that in times of panic his reactions return to default, without any pretense.
YouTube showed their colors — not that they need to — today by announcing that “to protect” their workers, they were giving them leaves of absence and therefore, there will be fewer human beings to unblock you when their logarithms block your YouTube account.
Our Community Guidelines enforcement today is based on a combination of people and technology: Machine learning helps detect potentially harmful content and then sends it to human reviewers for assessment. As a result of the new measures we’re taking, we will temporarily start relying more on technology to help with some of the work normally done by reviewers. This means automated systems will start removing some content without human review, so we can continue to act quickly to remove violative content and protect our ecosystem, while we have workplace protections in place.
Somehow, I get the sense that some YouTube employees will never return to work, even though they are now “protected”.
I also get the impression that the Management at YouTube sees the “crisis” caused by Wuhan-virus hype as their dream of dreams to implement Chinese like censorship.
Another sign that there is just too much political exploitation of the narrative to believe it anymore.
___________ CREDITS: The Featured Image is a screenshot of the YouTube.com official Blog page for YouTube creators, who were notified this morning that increased censorship is now teh default on their platform.
Lefties’ default is always censorship,
banning, restrictions, house arrest, etc.. The first sign of a Leftie
is that in times of panic his reactions return to default, without any
pretense.
YouTube showed their colors — not that
they need to — today by announcing that “to protect” their workers, they
were giving them leaves of absence and therefore, there will be fewer
human beings to unblock you when their logarithms block your YouTube
account.
Our Community Guidelines
enforcement today is based on a combination of people and technology:
Machine learning helps detect potentially harmful content and then sends
it to human reviewers for assessment. As a result of the new measures
we’re taking, we will temporarily start relying more on technology to
help with some of the work normally done by reviewers. This means
automated systems will start removing some content without human review,
so we can continue to act quickly to remove violative content and
protect our ecosystem, while we have workplace protections in place.
Somehow, I get the sense that some YouTube employees will never return to work, even though they are now “protected”.
I also get the impression that the
Management at YouTube sees the “crisis” caused by Wuhan-virus hype as
their dream of dreams to implement Chinese like censorship.
Another sign that there is just too much political exploitation of the narrative to believe it anymore.
___________
CREDITS: The Featured Image is a screenshot of the YouTube.com
official Blog page for YouTube creators, who were notified this morning
that increased censorship is now teh default on their platform.
THIS PRESENTATION PROVIDES INSIGHTS TO THE REAL PEOPLE WHO READ STORIES TO YOUNG KIDS IN THE LATEST CRAZE PROMOTED BY PROG-LIB LIBERTARIANS. THEY ARE NOT NICE. THEY ARE AGGRESSIVE. THEY ARE NASTY.
THE PARENTS WHO GO ALONG WITH THIS SEEM TO HAVE LOST ALL SENSE OF RIGHT AND WRONG.
HERE ARE RELATED VIDEOS FOR THOSE WHO MAY BE NEW TO THIS TREND AND THINK THIS NONSENSE IS ISOLATED OR A ONE-OFF. DRAG QUEEN STORY TIME FOR CHILDREN IS HAPPENING IN MANY WESTERN COUNTRIES...........
WHAT NEXT? STRIPPERS STORY TIME? PORN STAR STORY TIME?
THIS PRESENTATION PROVIDES INSIGHTS TO THE REAL PEOPLE WHO READ STORIES TO YOUNG KIDS IN THE LATEST CRAZE PROMOTED BY PROG-LIB LIBERTARIANS. THEY ARE NOT NICE. THEY ARE AGGRESSIVE. THEY ARE NASTY.
THE PARENTS WHO GO ALONG WITH THIS SEEM TO HAVE LOST ALL SENSE OF RIGHT AND WRONG.
HERE ARE RELATED VIDEOS FOR THOSE WHO MAY BE NEW TO THIS TREND AND THINK THIS NONSENSE IS ISOLATED OR A ONE-OFF. DRAG QUEEN STORY TIME FOR CHILDREN IS HAPPENING IN MANY WESTERN COUNTRIES...........
WHAT NEXT? STRIPPERS STORY TIME? PORN STAR STORY TIME?
It would be useful to read this prior article for background:
